During my internship at Binogi, I focused on improving internal tools used to manage lesson production and localization across multiple markets. Rather than redesigning visuals, I examined where workflow friction was slowing down real operational work.
The goal is to design an alternative interface which will be both functional and visually pleasing, and will improve user efficiency by increasing productivity with a more intuitive work flow.
Supervisors were responsible for identifying which lessons required localization, prioritizing them by market and stage, and assigning writers accordingly.
The existing workflow required manually scanning dense datasets with limited structural guidance.
Filtering, prioritization, and assignment were all handled within a single table view. This meant supervisors had to:
This Tool exposed data, but didn't support decision making clarity.
I spoke directly with the Localization Supervisor to understand the workflow and where friction occurred in her day-to-day coordination.
The issue wasn’t missing features.
It was structural overload.
Before redesigning anything visually, I mapped the process into stages:
Separating these steps clarified how the interface could better support each one.
Userflow for the Prioritizer Feature
The Prioritizer introduced:
The goal wasn't to simplify the work, it was to structure it more intentionally.
The prototype provides a means for users to filter available chapters to be assigned to specific writers.
The revised structure reduced ambiguity during lesson triage and made assignment decisions more straightforward.
Feedback from the supervisor indicated that the clearer grouping and filtering would make coordination less confusing and easier to manage day-to-day.
FLUX was used to track active localization tasks across languages and markets.
The original interface displayed over 20 columns within a single spreadsheet-style view, combining filtering, status tracking, and assignment in one dense surface.
Too much was happening in one place.
Supervisors had to:
All within the same interface.
The complexity of the domain was unavoidable, but the interface amplified that complexity.
The issue wasn't a lack of information, it was how tightly everything was coupled together.
Filtering, tracking, and assignment were blended into one continous task.
I broke the process into clearer operational stages:
This separation guided the redesign.
The FLUX redesign introduced:
The goal was to maintain necessary data density while reducing cognitive strain.
Userflow for the Prioritizer Feature
The restructured workflow improved scannability and clarified decision points.
When reviewing the concept, the supervisor noted that the clearer grouping and filtering would reduce confusion during daily coordination.
The work remains inherently complex, but the interface no longer adds unnessessary friction.
The concept allows users to download reports, estimate production costs while reducing any pain points .
This project reinforced an important principle:
Complex workflows don't always need simplification, they need clearer structure. Both MVP concepts focused on reorganizing information rather than removing it.
If developed further, I would validate improvements through measurable task completion time and error reduction.